The 1st page I look at defines the beneficiary as: “the 3rd social gathering beneficiary is the outsider suing the promisor,” which frankly, I don’t imagine is correct. If a 3rd get together beneficiary is the intentional beneficiary of income owed to him (a. k. a.

creditor beneficiary in 1st Restatement Terms), he can sue possibly/or the promisor/promisee or even sue each at the identical time. It’s small things like this which frankly irritates me, and it happens seemingly every five web pages. I’ve expended countless numbers of